Hayato Matsuoka vs Matthew Hulme Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 05:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Matsuoka vs M. Hulme

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Matsuoka 1 - 0 Hulme
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hayato Matsuoka winning 2 and Matthew Hulme winning 0. The last match between Hayato Matsuoka and Matthew Hulme was at the Brisbane 3 Challenger, 09-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Hayato Matsuoka getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matsuoka | 1 |
| Hulme | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Brisbane 3 Challenger(11-09-25)
H. Matsuoka vs M. Hulme H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.13% (86-70) | Career Total W/L | 48.92% (68-71) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Matsuoka vs M. Hulme Match Preview:
- How do they perform on second serves? In recent months, Matthew Hulme has a higher success rate with 48.59% compared to Hayato Matsuoka's 43.22%. This edge could be significant in determining the match outcome.
- Who is better at returning serves? Hayato Matsuoka leads in return statistics, winning 44.71% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Hulme only achieves 36.36%. Matsuoka also excels in first serve returns with a 32.48% win rate versus Hulme’s 27.20%.
- Under pressure, Matsuoka is slightly better, saving 52.56% of breakpoints, compared to Hulme’s 48.28%.
- Overall performance in the past year suggests Matsuoka is stronger, with a 55% match win rate compared to Hulme's 46%.
- What surfaces favor them? Both players excel on Hard surfaces with a 55% career win rate. They struggle on Indoor Hard, each having a 0% win rate.
- Analyzing their player level, Matsuoka has a better record at $10K tournaments, winning 61.11% of matches compared to Hulme’s 35.71%.
- Matsuoka has consistently faced slightly tougher opponents, with their average rank being 414.13 compared to Hulme’s 425.96.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Matsuoka has a slight edge, winning 42% of deciding sets over the past year, just above Hulme’s 40%.
- Current event performance should also be evaluated if they’ve played in this event before, as some players thrive in specific tournaments.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
Heading into this match, Hayato Matsuoka holds several statistical advantages that could play a critical role in determining the winner. His superior return game statistics indicate a strong ability to capitalize on Matthew Hulme's serves.
Moreover, Matsuoka has demonstrated a commendable ability to handle pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, which often becomes critical in tight matches.
Although both players share similar strengths on Hard surfaces, Matsuoka’s recent form, coupled with his higher win rate against slightly tougher opponents, gives him a distinct edge in consistency and competitive readiness.
Considering all metrics analyzed, Hayato Matsuoka is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis clash.
Hayato Matsuoka vs Matthew Hulme Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Matsuoka vs M. Hulme H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:30:15 | Average Match Time | 1:30:15 |
| 72% (41/57) | 1st Serve % | 75% (45/60) |
| 80% (33/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (30/45) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 37% (22/60) | Return Points Win % | 26% (15/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Matsuoka Recent Matches Played
M. Hulme Recent Matches Played

H. Matsuoka vs M. Hulme Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.13% (86/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.92% (68/71) |
| 55.04% (202/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.85% (163/164) |
| 52.78% (1815/1624) | Games Win/Loss | 50.85% (1706/1649) |
| 56.31% (58/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.86% (59/57) |
| 53.85% (28/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 234 | Aces Total | 585 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 365 | Total Double Faults | 221 |
| 1:34:31 | Average Match Time | 1:16:59 |
| 453.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 304.82 |
| 66% (5757/8735) | 1st Serve % | 68% (5016/7378) |
| 63% (3640/5757) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3508/5016) |
| 49% (1447/2978) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1207/2362) |
| 42% (434/1028) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (202/521) |
| 43% (3869/9064) | Return Points Win % | 35% (2514/7207) |
| 35.29% (6/11) | Challenger W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 57.55% (80/59) | Futures W/L | 49.17% (59/61) |
| 55% (86/156) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (66/137) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 46% (16/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (24/59) |
| 45% (25/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (21/49) |
| 82% (92/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (69/53) |
| 18% (92/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (69/16) |
| 17% (64/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (70/15) |